Found art

adams_abstract-2.jpg

Composition in Blue and Sienna
© 2003

My obsession with working abstractly has probably been fed by two things over the years: one – working with the quilt medium, which, if done with traditional patterns, involves working largely with geometric shapes, and two – if I can be honest here – the fact that I’m not too great at drawing or painting realistically. All that notwithstanding, however, I find I much prefer to look at abstract art rather than realistically painted scenes. But I’ll leave the whys and wherefores of that preference for a later date.

My real point here is that once you get into the habit of seeing, you realize that abstract compositions are all around you, until finally you get to the point where you can’t not see them. The above photo was taken at a construction site several years ago. Unfortunately, that was long before I had any ideas of writing a blog, and I was not in the habit of taking detailed notes about what I was photographing. So I’m not totally sure what this was – maybe the side of a vehicle or a container of some sort. I was making pictures of things that I thought might turn into compositions or possibly become elements for photomontage work. I have not done any Photoshopping on this image other than cropping it into a square composition.

I would like to think of some kind of a creative name for my series of similar images and possibly publish them as limited edition prints. But what would be a good name? “Found art”? “Discoveries”? “Serendipity”? Hmmm … keep thinking …

I’m not alone in my taste for what makes a great image. Check out these great photos by the very talented Jeanne Williamson. Amazing shades of blue!

January 20th, 2008|Inspiration, Photography|4 Comments

Pros and cons of formal art training

It was just about this time two years ago that I decided I wanted to go back to school and get a BFA. I had been making art for some time, more or less self taught except for a couple of drawing and painting classes I had taken as electives while working on other degrees, along with my coursework in graphic design. I was pretty happy with what I was doing – lots of photography, as I had done ever since my parents gave me my first camera as a child, some watercolor painting here and there, as well as my growing body of work in art quilts. I had taken several workshops in the fiber world, covering such things as improvisational piecing, fabric dyeing, machine stitching, etc. But I felt that something was missing.

So in late December of 2005, I was just spending a little time looking around on the Internet, and on a whim I decided to check out the art program at Metro State, the school at which I had earned my previous degree, Computer Information Systems & Management Science, in 1990. And once I saw that I already had most of the core classes and would only need the art classes, I decided to take the plunge and register for the upcoming spring semester. And that was it – I was a student again.

I’ve noticed that there is something of a controversy surrounding this topic. Some will say that a formal art education stifles creativity, or forces you to fit into a predetermined mold. Some art school graduates seem to feel that their experience was perhaps negative in some ways, while many self-taught artists wear the label like a badge of honor. My feeling is that you have to do what’s right for your own particular situation. For me, there have been both good and bad things about every class I’ve taken so far. While some of them seemed rather tedious or overlapped other classes from the past, I’ve learned something from each one, and the discipline provided from having to turn things in on a regular basis has forced me to go faster than I might do on my own.

I took my first watercolor class way back in 1986 when I was working on an AS in business at the local community college. Then I took Painting I in 1998, but it was on an audit basis, and so it doesn’t count for my new requirements and I had to take it again in the spring of 2007. But I didn’t go in thinking I already knew everything, and it turns out I learned a lot about how to paint, and how to see, as much from just doing it as anything else.

Here’s the results of the first assignment in that class:

Mike’s Cash Store – painting

Mike’s Cash Store
24 x 36 inches ©2006

The assignment was to copy a photograph in black and white to learn to see value. Here’s the photo I started with:

Mike’s Cash Store – photo

This is an abandoned storefront in Velarde, New Mexico. I drive by this place a couple of times a year on my way to Albuquerque to visit family. I’ve always wondered what the story is here. What happened on the day the owners finally decided to give up and shut the place down? Why is that chair just sitting there as though someone got up for a quick second to go get something out back, but will be coming back any minute?

To make the copy, you draw a grid on your photo, then you draw a proportionally enlarged grid on your canvas. It’s easier to figure out where everything goes when all you are responsible for is one square at a time, and you’re not just lost at sea on a huge blank surface. The photo had a bit of distortion in the perspective, which I tried to straighten out a little in the painting, but it’s obvious that it’s not perfect in a lot of places – the back of the chair really stands out as much too wide and strangely angled.

We were not allowed to use any black out of the tube; it had to be mixed from ultramarine blue & burnt sienna. If you didn’t make enough the first time and had to mix up more, it was challenging to get the new batch to match the temperature of the original one. This assignment was great practice in working with value (it’s all relative, baby!) and in reproducing textures. I had a lot of trouble with the bricks and and the weathered plywood. But it was also fun, and came out not too bad, I think.

January 15th, 2008|Painting, School|2 Comments

More on the Façade series

Deidre Adams – Façade III: Red Oxide

Façade III: Red Oxide
38 x 61 inches, ©2008

This piece and Façade IV: Chrome Oxide will be included in a show called Distinctive Directions at the Lux Center for the Arts in Lincoln, Nebraska, April 4 – 26, 2008. The show is curated by Lisa Call and features artists Pam RuBert, Joanie San Chirico, and Jeanne Williamson, and will be shown in conjunction with a solo show by Lisa Call, Fencing in or Keeping Out.

As mentioned in my last post, this work is inspired by surfaces of exterior walls of old buildings. While the sources are many, and the final piece is a composite of many things, I do have one image that relates rather directly to this piece.

Adams-rust1

Rusty Building, ©2002

This is from the side of what may have once been a mill for processing ore, located in Central City, a former mining town and now gambling town, in the mountains west of Denver. Although I took this photo over five years ago, I never made any art directly related to it, and even now I only noticed the resemblance after I was done with the piece. I do think that everything I’ve ever found inspiring, and especially those things that I’ve taken photos of, has stayed with me somewhere deep in my mind and contributes somehow to the overall aesthetic of my work.

January 11th, 2008|Inspiration|Comments Off on More on the Façade series