Translations – a gallery for textile art

translations.jpg

“Translations Gallery is a new art gallery in Denver, CO that is serving as a multitextural venue for both established and emerging artists. The gallery is an ambassador furthering the advancement of textile and fiber art forms on local, national, and international levels. Also, Translations Gallery is recognized as a destination for enthusiasts of these more contemporary art mediums.”
From the KMGH Channel 7 A*list web site listing.

Textile artists are indeed fortunate to have this top-notch venue dedicated to their art form. Gallery owner Judy Hagler and gallery manager Kate Merkel, along with the entire staff, are tireless in their efforts to promote textile art and artists. Their list of nationally and internationally known textile and fiber artists is indeed impressive. I feel especially lucky to have this gallery so close to home!

The piece next to the sign in the above photo is my Composition I, available at Translations Gallery.

Their current exhibition is weavings by James Koehler, on view through February 9.

January 23rd, 2008|Miscellaneous|Comments Off on Translations – a gallery for textile art

Found art

adams_abstract-2.jpg

Composition in Blue and Sienna
© 2003

My obsession with working abstractly has probably been fed by two things over the years: one – working with the quilt medium, which, if done with traditional patterns, involves working largely with geometric shapes, and two – if I can be honest here – the fact that I’m not too great at drawing or painting realistically. All that notwithstanding, however, I find I much prefer to look at abstract art rather than realistically painted scenes. But I’ll leave the whys and wherefores of that preference for a later date.

My real point here is that once you get into the habit of seeing, you realize that abstract compositions are all around you, until finally you get to the point where you can’t not see them. The above photo was taken at a construction site several years ago. Unfortunately, that was long before I had any ideas of writing a blog, and I was not in the habit of taking detailed notes about what I was photographing. So I’m not totally sure what this was – maybe the side of a vehicle or a container of some sort. I was making pictures of things that I thought might turn into compositions or possibly become elements for photomontage work. I have not done any Photoshopping on this image other than cropping it into a square composition.

I would like to think of some kind of a creative name for my series of similar images and possibly publish them as limited edition prints. But what would be a good name? “Found art”? “Discoveries”? “Serendipity”? Hmmm … keep thinking …

I’m not alone in my taste for what makes a great image. Check out these great photos by the very talented Jeanne Williamson. Amazing shades of blue!

January 20th, 2008|Inspiration, Photography|4 Comments

Pros and cons of formal art training

It was just about this time two years ago that I decided I wanted to go back to school and get a BFA. I had been making art for some time, more or less self taught except for a couple of drawing and painting classes I had taken as electives while working on other degrees, along with my coursework in graphic design. I was pretty happy with what I was doing – lots of photography, as I had done ever since my parents gave me my first camera as a child, some watercolor painting here and there, as well as my growing body of work in art quilts. I had taken several workshops in the fiber world, covering such things as improvisational piecing, fabric dyeing, machine stitching, etc. But I felt that something was missing.

So in late December of 2005, I was just spending a little time looking around on the Internet, and on a whim I decided to check out the art program at Metro State, the school at which I had earned my previous degree, Computer Information Systems & Management Science, in 1990. And once I saw that I already had most of the core classes and would only need the art classes, I decided to take the plunge and register for the upcoming spring semester. And that was it – I was a student again.

I’ve noticed that there is something of a controversy surrounding this topic. Some will say that a formal art education stifles creativity, or forces you to fit into a predetermined mold. Some art school graduates seem to feel that their experience was perhaps negative in some ways, while many self-taught artists wear the label like a badge of honor. My feeling is that you have to do what’s right for your own particular situation. For me, there have been both good and bad things about every class I’ve taken so far. While some of them seemed rather tedious or overlapped other classes from the past, I’ve learned something from each one, and the discipline provided from having to turn things in on a regular basis has forced me to go faster than I might do on my own.

I took my first watercolor class way back in 1986 when I was working on an AS in business at the local community college. Then I took Painting I in 1998, but it was on an audit basis, and so it doesn’t count for my new requirements and I had to take it again in the spring of 2007. But I didn’t go in thinking I already knew everything, and it turns out I learned a lot about how to paint, and how to see, as much from just doing it as anything else.

Here’s the results of the first assignment in that class:

Mike’s Cash Store – painting

Mike’s Cash Store
24 x 36 inches ©2006

The assignment was to copy a photograph in black and white to learn to see value. Here’s the photo I started with:

Mike’s Cash Store – photo

This is an abandoned storefront in Velarde, New Mexico. I drive by this place a couple of times a year on my way to Albuquerque to visit family. I’ve always wondered what the story is here. What happened on the day the owners finally decided to give up and shut the place down? Why is that chair just sitting there as though someone got up for a quick second to go get something out back, but will be coming back any minute?

To make the copy, you draw a grid on your photo, then you draw a proportionally enlarged grid on your canvas. It’s easier to figure out where everything goes when all you are responsible for is one square at a time, and you’re not just lost at sea on a huge blank surface. The photo had a bit of distortion in the perspective, which I tried to straighten out a little in the painting, but it’s obvious that it’s not perfect in a lot of places – the back of the chair really stands out as much too wide and strangely angled.

We were not allowed to use any black out of the tube; it had to be mixed from ultramarine blue & burnt sienna. If you didn’t make enough the first time and had to mix up more, it was challenging to get the new batch to match the temperature of the original one. This assignment was great practice in working with value (it’s all relative, baby!) and in reproducing textures. I had a lot of trouble with the bricks and and the weathered plywood. But it was also fun, and came out not too bad, I think.

January 15th, 2008|Painting, School|2 Comments